I read on Straits Times online, an article on a petition against censorship — "Censorship Isn’t Working : Regulate Instead".
Petitions and online forums intrigue me, because they are one of the few avenues in which Singaporeans openly express their opinions, and also because they have been accused in the past of having been manipulated to inflate online signatures or participants.
I was also intrigued that Singaporeans are for once calling for more regluation instead of less.
Now doubly intrigued, I googled "Censorship Isn’t Working : Regulate Instead".

And was surprised to see that the third link, after the Arts Engage the group responsible for the petition, and ahead of even the Straits Times article, pointed to AWARE, the Association of Women for Action and Research.
AWARE has in the past been accused of allowing itself to be hijacked for causes that had more to do with conservative Christian objections to homosexuality at one end and, at the other extreme, liberal gay and lesbian rights, than with women. (In brief, several conservative Christians took the view that AWARE was being used as a platform to advocate for gay and lesbian rights, and got themselves elected into the AWARE Executive Committee, in order to steer AWARE back to its original causes. This prompted a backlash from, I suppose, people who felt that a society should not be hijacked by conservative Christians with a common objection to gay and lesbian rights, and I assume advocates for gay and lesbian rights, who convened an extraordinary general meeting to vote them out).
The link to AWARE left me truly intrigued. How are arts and women connected ? Is AWARE now being hijacked by anti-censorship advocates ?


The AWARE article on "Have you said NO to censorship" doesn’t disclose why AWARE has any interest in the issue of censorship of the arts. It doesn’t, for example, suggest that such censorship prevents women from freely expressing their opinions through art, or that it affects the liberty or livelihood of women in the arts industry. It does, however, invite readers to sign the petition by clicking on a link at the bottom of the page. Furthermore, I note that "Have you said NO to censorship" is unlike the other articles on the same page which deal with issues that are more clearly related to women’s concerns, such as eating disorders, helping someone deal with domestic violence and sexual harassment.
So I don’t have answers to the questions I’ve posed above, not that it really matters to me (since I’m male), other than to say that there appears to be merit to the allegations that AWARE has allowed itself to become a platform for causes other than women’s causes.